If 2024 was a year of transition in MBA admissions, 2025 was the year everything settled into place.
By the end of 2025, applicants were no longer “figuring out” the GMAT Focus Edition, business schools had fully normalized GRE and Executive Assessment policies, and test choice became less about prestige and more about strategy.
Looking back at the year, several clear patterns emerged across GMAT, GRE, Executive Assessment, and MBA admissions as a whole. Some confirmed expectations. Others surprised even experienced admissions professionals.
Here’s what 2025 really showed — and what future applicants should take away.
1. GMAT Focus Edition: Normalized, but not simplified
By 2025, the GMAT Focus Edition was no longer “new.” The uncertainty that defined early adopters faded, replaced by a clearer understanding of how schools interpret scores.
What stood out in 2025:
- Score expectations stabilized across top programs
- Schools became more comfortable comparing GMAT Focus scores with legacy GMAT results
- Applicants adjusted preparation strategies, especially around Quant and Data Insights
One of the biggest misconceptions that 2025 finally put to rest was the idea that the GMAT Focus is “easier.” While shorter and more targeted, it demands greater precision, particularly under time pressure.
Another noticeable trend was retake behavior. Fewer candidates retook the exam multiple times, but those who did were more intentional — focusing on specific sections rather than chasing marginal total-score increases.
Key insight: In 2025, a strong GMAT Focus score was less about perfection and more about alignment with school expectations and overall profile strength.
2. GRE in 2025: From alternative to strategic first choice
The GRE’s role in MBA admissions quietly but decisively changed in 2025.
Rather than serving as a backup for GMAT underperformers, the GRE increasingly became a primary choice — especially for candidates with strong verbal reasoning, international backgrounds, or dual-degree plans.
Notable developments:
- Greater acceptance of GRE scores across elite U.S. and European MBA programs
- More applicants choosing GRE intentionally from the start
- Clearer differentiation in how schools weigh GRE Verbal vs Quant
Applicants also became more realistic about trade-offs. A slightly weaker Quant score on the GRE was no longer automatically disqualifying if the overall academic and professional profile made sense.
Key insight: In 2025, choosing the GRE wasn’t a compromise — it was often a strategic advantage when aligned with the applicant’s strengths and target schools.
3. Executive Assessment: Still misunderstood, but increasingly powerful
Despite being around for years, the Executive Assessment (EA) remained the most misunderstood exam in 2025.
Many applicants continued to assume the EA was simply an “easier GMAT.” In reality, successful EA candidates shared a specific profile:
- Significant professional experience
- Clear career progression
- Programs that explicitly welcomed or preferred the EA
What changed in 2025 was how schools evaluated EA scores. Admissions committees looked less at absolute numbers and more at context — leadership experience, seniority, and clarity of goals.
Applicants who treated the EA strategically often benefited. Those who used it to “avoid” the GMAT without fitting the target profile did not.
Key insight: In 2025, the EA worked best when used deliberately — not as a shortcut, but as a signal aligned with experience and program fit.
4. MBA admissions in 2025: Exams mattered, but not in isolation
Perhaps the most important lesson from 2025 wasn’t about any single exam — it was about how exams fit into the broader admissions picture.
Several macro trends became clearer:
- Increased score flexibility across schools
- Stronger emphasis on professional impact and leadership
- More nuanced evaluation of international candidates
- Greater tolerance for “non-perfect” scores within compelling profiles
Geographic differences also persisted. European programs continued to take a more holistic approach, while U.S. schools maintained higher score benchmarks — though even there, rigid cutoffs softened.
Key insight: By 2025, standardized tests were firmly one component of a multidimensional evaluation, not the defining factor.
5. What surprised admissions experts in 2025
Looking across the year, a few developments stood out as unexpected:
- Applicants with lower-than-average scores succeeding due to strong narratives
- Fewer panic retakes late in the cycle
- Earlier and more informed exam decisions
- Less fixation on percentile rankings and more on realistic competitiveness
Applicants appeared better educated, more strategic, and less driven by outdated “target score” myths.
6. What this means for 2026 applicants
If 2025 taught applicants anything, it’s that smart decisions outperform aggressive ones.
For those applying in 2026 and beyond:
- Choose your exam based on strengths and schools — not prestige
- Prepare with intent, not volume
- Understand what your score communicates in context
- Stop optimizing for numbers in isolation
The most successful candidates in 2025 weren’t chasing perfection. They were building coherent, credible applications where test scores supported — rather than defined — the story.
Final thoughts
MBA admissions in 2025 became quieter, calmer, and more rational.
Less panic. Less noise. More strategy.
As exams like the GMAT Focus, GRE, and Executive Assessment continue to coexist, the real advantage belongs to applicants who understand how admissions committees actually read scores — not how rankings websites describe them.
And that, more than any single number, is the lesson worth carrying into 2026.
Ready to kickstart your exam preparation?
El Brujo Method has a proven track record helping students get accepted to leading universities, business schools and specialized programs.
Made with Scene.io